Planetary Jenga

Posted by Adam on Apr 6th, 2007

jenga.jpg

“We’re like people living in the penthouse of a tall brick building. Every day we need 200 bricks to maintain our walls, so we go downstairs, knock 200 bricks out of the walls below and bring them back upstairs for our own use. Every day. . . . Every day we go downstairs and knock 200 bricks out of the walls that are holding up the building we live in. Seventy thousand bricks a year, year after year after year.”

What on earth is this guy talking about? That’s absurd. Who would do such a thing?

Me. I’m doing that.

The writer’s referring to the fact that, due to an essential flaw in our cultural program, humans (me, and I presume you) destroy two hundred species of life a day. Every day. These sickening but true words were written by Daniel Quinn, in a speech of his called ‘The New Renaissance,” which you can read here.

Right now, I’m taking a class in Personal Ecology at Depaul. It’s a prerequisite, and I figured I might pick up a few new ideas on how to be a little more environmentally-friendly, but I wasn’t expecting any major eurekas or anything.

My professor assigned us Quinn’s book Ishmael to read over the course of two weeks. I sucked it down in two days. It was that good. I mean really good.

Eureka!-good.

It’s the story of a man who meets a highly intelligent gorilla named Ishmael. The man wants to know how to save the world and the gorilla promises to teach him. Ishmael proceeds to systematically school the man in the true nature of the destructive cultural subcurrent running through all civilization.

The sum of Ishmael’s message is fairly simple (though I highly, highly encourage you to follow his thread for your self ). Somewhere around the time of the agricultural revolution, we got this strange idea that this world was made for us instead of us being made for the world. As Quinn puts it in “The New Renaissance,” “Humans belong to an order of being that is separate from the rest of the living community.” This notion, he argues, is at the bottom of a great deal of our strife and struggle.

I tend to think he’s exactly right.

The fact is, there is a massive ecological problem facing us right now. Either the problem is with the Earth itself, or the problem is with us. As far as I can tell, the Earth works pretty great, so my guess it that the problem must be with us, and more specifically, with our perspective.

My perspective.

Laws aren’t going to do it. The Kyoto Protocol’s not going to do it. Recycling’s not going to do it. Hybrid cars are definitely not going to do it.

But if we could get it into our heads that this is our home and our neighborhood and not our kingdom, that might actually do it.

And, of course, there is the living it out too. That’s the domain of the laws and recycling and hybrid cars. But those are effects, not causes. The perspective shift has to come first, or else the effects will be empty and feeble.

I don’t know how to go about doing something about this other than to communicate this perspective to you. I think it’s the only way it’ll happen really. Bono could talk about it on TV and people would get excited for a while, but the only way I think its going to stick is for me to begin seeing life in this way and to talk about it with you. And for you to see life in this way and to talk about it with some other people too.

And so on.

Until we all decide it’s time to stop playing Jenga.

-Adam

“During your lifetime, the people of our culture are going to figure out how to live sustainably on this planet–or they’re not. Either way, it’s certainly going to be extraordinary. If they figure out how to live sustainably here, then humanity will be able to see something it can’t see right now: a future that extends into the indefinite future. If they don’t figure this out, then I’m afraid the human race is going to take its place among the species that we’re driving into extinction here every day–as many as 200–every day.”

4 Responses

  1. Dad R. Says:

    First, I haven’t read the book. But a couple of things seem clear to me. Ishmael is right that we are the only species that seems to be out of step with the creation and destroying it. There is a reason for that, and it is called “our sin nature”. We are the only ones who have it and it didn’t start with the agricultural revolution. It started way before that and it’s cause is “the Fall”. Ever since then we have been (and will be) out of step with this wonderful creation and destroying it. Only if (or when) we are (and live as) truely redeemd people, will we be able to rule over the Kingdom benevolently (and, yes it is a Kingdom, created by God for man and man for it). That is our eventual destiny as Redeemed humans, to rule over the new Earth, along with the King and Creator Jesus.
    Until that time, all the human efforts we can muster will be like bailing out the Titanic with a tea cup. That doesn’t mean we shouldn’t be trying. We should be the best examples as caretakers of creation rather than consumers of it. But we should also not be surprised when it still appears to be sinking, and when people say “What is this world coming to?” there is an answer to that question, “An End”, and after that, a new Kingdom where we will be in harmony with the creation because will be in harmony with the Creator. We, of all people, should be the ones who take loving care of this World. And in the process, we need to not lose sight of the fact that the Human race is not “THE” problem. We are the Masterpiece of all creation and destined to be the rulers over it and caretakers of it.
    What do you think Ishmael would say about that?
    dad

  2. Dee Cee Says:

    Adrock–something you gots to read, along these same lines…Thom Hartmann’s_Last Hours of Ancient Sunlight_. Its a fantastic read, I think I have mentioned it before, but you should nab it for the class.

  3. MOM Says:

    I don’t know about Ishmael’s response, but Dad & I just want to shout AMEN BROTHER!!!!!!
    MOM&DAD L.

  4. CobblyWorlds Says:

    Planetary Jenga is a phrase I’ve used without ever having heard anyone else use it, until I popped it into Google and found your site.

    Here in the UK we have large sea-bird populations on islands off the Scottish West Coast. On islands like Foula there’s been a crash in the numbers of guillemots.

    Guillemots feed on sand-eels and sand-eel numbers have been dropping massively. This had been blamed on local fishing. However now it seems the plankton that the sand-eels feed off have moved north as the scottish waters have warmed with Global Warming. With too few sand-eels the guillemots can’t feed their young.

    Such effects are being seen across the globe, with only 0.6degC warming in the last 30 years and the ability to cause many degrees of further warming over this century. Physics allows confidence in the warming due to CO2, common sense tells us more people causes more pressure on ecosystems. But the secondary effects of both are so complex we have no hope of predicting the details. We’re walking blindly into a briar-patch.

    These subtle secondary effects remind me of an old rhyme.

    “For want of a nail the shoe was lost.
    For want of a shoe the horse was lost.
    For want of a horse the rider was lost.
    For want of a rider the battle was lost.
    For want of a battle the kingdom was lost.

    And all for the want of a horseshoe nail.”

    Regards

    Cobbly.

Leave a Comment

Please note: Comment moderation is enabled and may delay your comment. There is no need to resubmit your comment.

Recent Photos:

www.flickr.com

Lofbomm Local Time:

Sites We Love...

Check out Adam's Voiceover Site: Voice123.com - The Voice Over Marketplace

voice123.jpg

Categories

Adam's del.icio.us Links

last.fm records

  1. Children Running Through
  2. Instant Pig
  3. Impossible Dream
  4. Flaming Red
  5. 1000 Kisses

Subscribe Me!